{
    "schema": "amendsignal.record/1",
    "generated_on": "2026-11-02",
    "publisher": {
        "name": "AmendSignal",
        "url": "https://amendsignal.com/"
    },
    "notice": "Coverage is limited, so a missing record does not mean nothing changed. General information, not legal advice. Check the official source. Please cite the record's url.",
    "change": {
        "id": 8,
        "url": "https://amendsignal.com/changes/department-of-homeland-security-proposes-ending-the-up-to-60-day-grace-period-for-visa-workers-whose/",
        "title": "Department of Homeland Security proposes ending the up to 60-day grace period for visa workers whose job ends",
        "change_type": "proposed_rule",
        "change_type_label": "Proposed rule",
        "status": "proposed",
        "status_label": "Proposed",
        "status_statement": "As of our last check on November 2, 2026, this is a proposal, not a requirement. Comments are due November 10, 2026.",
        "significance": "Proposed, nothing required yet",
        "jurisdiction": {
            "code": "US",
            "name": "United States"
        },
        "authority": {
            "name": "Department of Homeland Security",
            "short_name": "DHS"
        },
        "identifiers": [
            {
                "type": "fr_document_number",
                "label": "FR document",
                "value": "2026-18631"
            },
            {
                "type": "fr_citation",
                "label": "Citation",
                "value": "91 FR 57807"
            },
            {
                "type": "rin",
                "label": "RIN",
                "value": "1615-AD22"
            },
            {
                "type": "docket_id",
                "label": "Docket",
                "value": "CIS No. 2858-26"
            },
            {
                "type": "docket_id",
                "label": "Docket",
                "value": "DHS Docket No. USCIS-2026-0364"
            },
            {
                "type": "cfr_citation",
                "label": "CFR",
                "value": "8 CFR 204"
            },
            {
                "type": "cfr_citation",
                "label": "CFR",
                "value": "8 CFR 214"
            }
        ],
        "dates": [
            {
                "type": "publication",
                "label": "Published",
                "value": "2026-09-11",
                "precision": "day"
            },
            {
                "type": "comment_close",
                "label": "Comments due",
                "value": "2026-11-10",
                "precision": "day"
            }
        ],
        "in_short": {
            "what_changed": "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to end the up to 60-day grace period that lets workers in the E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 and TN (Canadian and Mexican professional) classifications, and their dependents, keep their status after a job ends. It is a proposal, not a final rule.",
            "whos_affected": "Employers that sponsor or hire workers in these classifications, mostly H-1B employers, and especially employers that hire workers between jobs. Employers of dependent spouses who are authorized to work could also be affected.",
            "what_to_do": "This proposed rule creates no new duties for employers, and nothing changes unless DHS issues a final rule. Employers that rely on the grace period may want to comment by November 10, 2026, and plan for a possible final rule."
        },
        "summary": "The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to remove the rule that lets workers in the E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 and TN (Canadian and Mexican professional) classifications, and their dependents, keep their status for up to 60 days after their job ends. If the proposal is finalized, these workers would be out of status the day after their job ends and would need to leave the United States unless otherwise authorized to stay. This is a proposal only, and comments are due November 10, 2026.",
        "business_functions": {
            "state": "limited",
            "functions": [
                {
                    "slug": "human-resources",
                    "name": "Human resources"
                },
                {
                    "slug": "legal-and-compliance",
                    "name": "Legal and compliance"
                }
            ]
        },
        "added_on": "2026-11-02",
        "updated_on": null,
        "updates_in_progress": null,
        "last_checked": "2026-11-02",
        "record_url": "https://amendsignal.com/changes/department-of-homeland-security-proposes-ending-the-up-to-60-day-grace-period-for-visa-workers-whose/record.json",
        "what_changed": [
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS proposes to remove the discretionary grace period of up to 60 days found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2).",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule",
                        "excerpt": "As such, DHS proposes to remove the discretionary up to 60-day grace period provided in 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2)."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "Under the current rule, a worker in one of these classifications and their dependents may stay for up to 60 days, or until the end of the authorized validity period if shorter, without being treated as out of status because the job ended, unless DHS shortens or eliminates the period. The worker is not authorized to work during the grace period unless otherwise authorized.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "III.F. Creation of the Up to 60-Day Discretionary Grace Period",
                        "excerpt": "allowed an alien present in the United States in one of those statuses, and their dependents, to remain in the United States for up to 60 days or until the end of the authorized validity period, whichever is shorter"
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "Nonimmigrants are not authorized to work during the grace period, unless otherwise authorized."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "Under the proposal, the worker and their dependents would be treated as out of status the day after the worker's employment or activity ends, and would be expected to leave the United States unless otherwise authorized to stay.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "they, and their dependents, would be considered to be immediately failing to maintain their nonimmigrant status the day after the principal alien's employment or activity ceases."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS also proposes a technical change to remove a cross-reference to the grace period from 8 CFR 204.5(p)(1)(i).",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Footnote 19",
                        "excerpt": "DHS also proposes a technical revision ... from 8 CFR 204.5(p)(1)(i)."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS says the change would tie a worker's status directly to the job that was the basis for it and would reduce administrative burden.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "SUMMARY",
                        "excerpt": "This proposal restores a direct relationship between an alien's nonimmigrant status and the specific employment or activity that formed the basis of his or her admission or grant of status in the United States and reduces administrative burden."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "The grace period was created by a 2016 final rule that took effect on January 17, 2017.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "III.F. Creation of the Up to 60-Day Discretionary Grace Period",
                        "excerpt": "The rule was effective on January 17, 2017."
                    }
                ]
            }
        ],
        "who_is_affected": [
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "The proposal covers workers in the E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 and TN classifications and their dependents.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "II.C. Costs and Benefits",
                        "excerpt": "no longer providing an up to 60-day discretionary grace period for aliens admitted or otherwise provided status in the E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN classifications, and their dependents"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS estimates that about 65,752 workers a year in these classifications lost or changed jobs in fiscal years 2021 through 2025, and that 99 percent of them held H-1B status.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "number of primary beneficiaries who experienced either cessation of employment or voluntarily changed employer is 65,752"
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "Ninety-nine percent of 328,758 E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 and TN primary beneficiaries that either lost their job or changed employers from FY 2021 through FY 2025 belong to the H-1B classification."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS recognizes that U.S. employers that hire recently terminated workers in these classifications may have relied on those workers being able to start new jobs without leaving the country.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "U.S. employers who seek to employ recently terminated aliens in the relevant classifications may have made business arrangements based on an assumption that the aliens would be able to begin new employment"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "text": "Employers of dependent spouses who are authorized to work (for example, L-2 spouses, or certain H-4 spouses with employment authorization) could be affected, because under the proposal dependents would also fall out of status the day after the principal worker's job ends.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "Spouses of L-1 workers in valid L-2 nonimmigrant status are considered employment authorized incident to status."
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "Certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants can seek employment authorization by filing Form I-765"
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "they, and their dependents, would be considered to be immediately failing to maintain their nonimmigrant status the day after the principal alien's employment or activity ceases."
                    }
                ]
            }
        ],
        "business_implications": [
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS says some workers would need to leave the country rather than stay and start a new job without departing, and could lose income while they look for work.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "II.C. Costs and Benefits",
                        "excerpt": "because they would need to leave the country instead of being able to stay and begin new employment without departing."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS says workers could still apply to come back in an employment-based status after finding a new qualifying job and getting the needed approvals.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.B. Requiring Nonimmigrants To Depart Upon Cessation of Employment or Activity",
                        "excerpt": "aliens subject to this rule would, however, be able to apply for readmission into the United States in a nonimmigrant employment-based status after finding new qualifying employment"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "text": "If finalized, hiring a worker who is between jobs in one of these classifications would likely take longer, because the worker could not rely on a grace period to stay in the United States while a new petition is filed.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "without the potentially lengthier process of seeking admission from outside the United States"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "DHS lists, as a cost for employers, that H-1B and O-1 petitioners would be liable for the reasonable costs of return transportation abroad when they dismiss a worker before the end of the authorized stay and the worker decides to leave.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Table 1--Summary of Provisions and Impacts of the NPRM",
                        "excerpt": "H-1B and O-1 petitioners would be liable for the reasonable costs of return transportation abroad"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "text": "The document notes that H-1B employers are already required to notify U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) right away when they no longer employ the worker, and that some employers currently do not.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Footnote 48",
                        "excerpt": "an H-1B employer is required to immediately notify USCIS such as by submitting a letter of withdrawal, when the employer no longer employs the beneficiary, whether through termination or resignation"
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Footnote 49",
                        "excerpt": "currently some employers do not notify USCIS or file a withdrawal when an H-1B worker ceases to work for the company"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "text": "The separate grace period of up to 10 days at 8 CFR 214.1(l)(1) is not what this proposal removes, and the document says it applies only after the validity period ends, not when a job ends early.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Footnote 16",
                        "excerpt": "Because 8 CFR 214.1(l)(1) specifies that this 10-day grace period applies ``after the validity period ends,'' it would not apply to a worker who ceases employment during the approved validity period."
                    }
                ]
            }
        ],
        "required_actions": [],
        "recommended_actions": [
            {
                "kind": "recommendation",
                "kind_label": "Our suggestion",
                "text": "Consider submitting comments through regulations.gov under docket USCIS-2026-0364, especially if your hiring or workforce plans rely on the grace period. DHS specifically invites comments on reliance interests.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "ADDRESSES",
                        "excerpt": "identified by DHS Docket No. USCIS-2026-0364 through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov."
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "DHS invites comments on any potential impact of this rulemaking, including comments on any potential reliance interests that are implicated by the provisions of this NPRM."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "recommendation",
                "kind_label": "Our suggestion",
                "text": "Consider identifying employees in the listed classifications, and employees whose work authorization depends on a spouse's status, so you can gauge your exposure if the proposal is finalized.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.B. Requiring Nonimmigrants To Depart Upon Cessation of Employment or Activity",
                        "excerpt": "an alien's lawful status in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, or TN classification is directly connected to and contingent upon the alien conducting certain employment activities"
                    },
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "Spouses of L-1 workers in valid L-2 nonimmigrant status are considered employment authorized incident to status."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "recommendation",
                "kind_label": "Our suggestion",
                "text": "Consider reviewing recruiting plans that depend on hiring visa workers between jobs, and termination or layoff practices for these workers, since a final rule would remove the time they now have to find a new sponsor.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "U.S. employers who seek to employ recently terminated aliens in the relevant classifications may have made business arrangements based on an assumption that the aliens would be able to begin new employment"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "recommendation",
                "kind_label": "Our suggestion",
                "text": "Consider confirming that your process for notifying USCIS when an H-1B worker leaves is followed, since the document describes that as an existing requirement.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Footnote 48",
                        "excerpt": "an H-1B employer is required to immediately notify USCIS such as by submitting a letter of withdrawal, when the employer no longer employs the beneficiary, whether through termination or resignation"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "kind": "recommendation",
                "kind_label": "Our suggestion",
                "text": "Consider budgeting for possible return transportation costs for dismissed H-1B and O-1 workers and for delays in filling roles if the proposal is finalized.",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "Table 1--Summary of Provisions and Impacts of the NPRM",
                        "excerpt": "H-1B and O-1 petitioners would be liable for the reasonable costs of return transportation abroad"
                    }
                ]
            }
        ],
        "required_actions_assessment": {
            "state": "assessed",
            "text": "This is a proposed rule, so it creates no requirements for employers. Nothing changes unless DHS issues a final rule."
        },
        "applicability": [
            {
                "criterion": "where",
                "label": "Where",
                "answer": "United States, nationwide",
                "kind": "fact",
                "kind_label": "From the source",
                "evidence": []
            },
            {
                "criterion": "employer_type",
                "label": "Employers",
                "answer": "Employers that petition for or employ workers in the E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 or TN classifications.",
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.B. Requiring Nonimmigrants To Depart Upon Cessation of Employment or Activity",
                        "excerpt": "an alien's lawful status in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, or TN classification is directly connected to and contingent upon the alien conducting certain employment activities"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "criterion": "size",
                "label": "Size",
                "answer": "No employer size threshold; it turns on whether you employ workers in the listed classifications.",
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "II.C. Costs and Benefits",
                        "excerpt": "no longer providing an up to 60-day discretionary grace period for aliens admitted or otherwise provided status in the E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN classifications, and their dependents"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "criterion": "industries",
                "label": "Industries",
                "answer": "All industries; employers of H-1B workers are the most affected, since 99 percent of the workers DHS counted hold H-1B status.",
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "V.A.2. Background and Population",
                        "excerpt": "Ninety-nine percent of 328,758 E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 and TN primary beneficiaries that either lost their job or changed employers from FY 2021 through FY 2025 belong to the H-1B classification."
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "criterion": "functions",
                "label": "Functions",
                "answer": "Human resources (hiring, terminations and work authorization) and legal and compliance (immigration petitions).",
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "IV.D. Reliance Interests and Potential Impact of This Rule",
                        "excerpt": "U.S. employers who seek to employ recently terminated aliens in the relevant classifications may have made business arrangements based on an assumption that the aliens would be able to begin new employment"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "criterion": "applies_if",
                "label": "Applies if",
                "answer": "You employ or plan to hire a worker in one of these classifications whose job ends before their authorized stay expires.",
                "kind": "inference",
                "kind_label": "Our analysis",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "SUMMARY",
                        "excerpt": "an up to 60-day grace period upon cessation of employment prior to the expiration of the alien's authorized period of stay"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "criterion": "action",
                "label": "Action",
                "answer": "Nothing required now; consider commenting by November 10, 2026.",
                "kind": "recommendation",
                "kind_label": "Our suggestion",
                "evidence": [
                    {
                        "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                        "locator": "DATES",
                        "excerpt": "Written comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) must be submitted on or before November 10, 2026."
                    }
                ]
            }
        ],
        "open_questions": [
            {
                "question": "Would a final rule apply to workers whose job ended before the final rule takes effect?",
                "context": "The document as provided does not describe any transition rules for workers already in a grace period."
            },
            {
                "question": "Would a worker have to leave on the day the job ends, or by the day after?",
                "context": "Section IV.D says status would lapse the day after the job ends, but Footnote 32 says the worker would have to depart on the day the job ends."
            },
            {
                "question": "Does the full proposal include other provisions not shown in this copy?",
                "context": "The copy analyzed ends partway through the cost analysis, so the proposed regulatory text and later sections are not included."
            }
        ],
        "events": [
            {
                "event_type": "originating_action",
                "label": "Issued",
                "occurred_on": "2026-09-11",
                "summary": "Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period",
                "source": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period"
            }
        ],
        "corrections": [],
        "sources": [
            {
                "label": "Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period, 91 FR 57807 (September 11, 2026)",
                "publisher": "Federal Register",
                "role": "primary",
                "url": "https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18631/eliminating-the-discretionary-60-day-grace-period",
                "pdf_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-09-11/pdf/2026-18631.pdf"
            }
        ]
    }
}