National Labor Relations Board General Counsel lists Board decisions she is asking or plans to ask the Board to overturn
As of our last check on November 2, 2026, this is agency guidance, not a rule. It explains how the agency reads the law and does not create a legal requirement on its own.
In short
- What changed
- The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published memo GC 26-04. It lists positions already taken asking the Board to overturn seven recent decisions, and six more decisions the General Counsel intends to challenge when a suitable case arises.
- Who's affected
- Employers and unions with cases before the NLRB that involve these issues, especially unionized employers and employers facing organizing. The memo itself is addressed to NLRB regional staff.
- What to do
- This memo creates no new duties for employers. Current Board decisions still apply, so keep following them while watching for Board rulings on the cases the memo names.
What changed
-
From the sourceIntroduction
I am issuing this memorandum to identify cases where I have requested or intend to request the Board to revisit certain precedents.
The General Counsel says the memo identifies cases where the General Counsel has asked, or intends to ask, the Board to revisit certain precedents.
-
From the sourcePositions Taken by the General Counsel
Severance Agreements (and other Employment Agreements): Arguing to overrule McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023)
Also: Positions Taken by the General Counsel
Consent Orders: Requesting to overturn Metro Health Inc. d/b/a Hospital Metropolitano Rio Piedras, 373 NLRB No. 89 (2024)
Also: Positions Taken by the General Counsel
Work Rules: Arguing to overturn Stericycle , 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023)
Also: Positions Taken by the General Counsel
Captive Audience Meetings: Encouraging the Board to reverse Amazon.com Services LLC., 373 NLRB No. 136 (2024), and return to the longstanding “captive audience” standard set in Babcock & Wilcox, 77 NLRB No. 577 (1948)
Positions already taken: overturning McLaren Macomb (2023) on severance and other employment agreements, Metro Health (2024) on consent orders, Stericycle (2023) on work rules, and Amazon.com Services (2024) on captive audience meetings.
-
From the sourcePositions Taken by the General Counsel
that I do not share my predecessor’s views on Siren Retail Corp. d/b/a Starbucks , 373 NLRB No. 135 (2024), and will argue to the Board to reinstate Tri -Cast, Inc., 274 NLRB No. 377 (1985).
Also: Positions Taken by the General Counsel
I argue against application of Tesla, Inc., 371 NLRB No. 131 (2022), and request the Board to reinstate Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 368 NLRB No. 146 (2019).
Also: Positions Taken by the General Counsel
I noted the standard set in Endurance Environmental Solutions, LLC, 373 NLRB No. 141 (2024) should be overturned.
Further positions already taken: setting aside Siren Retail (2024) on employer predictions about the effects of unionization, Tesla (2022) on dress codes, and Endurance Environmental Solutions (2024) on waiver of the right to bargain.
-
From the sourceAnticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
I intend to challenge several other precedents, if the opportunity arises
Also: Anticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
Bargaining Orders: Intent to challenge the Board’s decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (2023)
Also: Anticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
Intent to challenge the Board’s positions in Wendt Corporation, 372 NLRB No. 135 (2023), and Tecnocap, LLC , 372 NLRB No. 136 (2023)
Also: Anticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
Intent to argue to the Board to overturn UFCW Local 700 (Kroger Limited Partnership), 361 NLRB 420 (2014)
Also: Anticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
Protected Concerted Activity: Intent to urge the Board to revisit Miller Plastic Products, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 134 (2023)
Also: Anticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
I disagree with Valley Hospital Medical Center, Inc., 371 NLRB No. 160, (2022)
Also: Anticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
I intend to request the Board to reconsider Thryv Inc., 372 NLRB No. 22 (2022)
Positions the General Counsel intends to present when a suitable case arises: challenging Cemex (2023) on bargaining orders, Wendt and Tecnocap (2023) on bargaining before changing terms of employment, Kroger (2014) on union objector fees, Miller Plastic Products and Lion Elastomers II (2023) on protected concerted activity, Valley Hospital Medical Center (2022) on dues checkoff after a contract expires, and Thryv (2022) on enhanced remedies.
-
From the sourceIntroduction
This memorandum does not require specific cases to be submitted to the Division of Advice.
Also: Introduction
Regions should continue to investigate the cases and, if justified, pursue prosecution according to extant Board law.
Regional offices are told to keep investigating and, if justified, prosecuting cases under current Board law. Cases on these issues do not have to be sent to the Division of Advice.
-
From the sourceAnticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
This memorandum may be updated and reissued when arguments are finalized.
Also: Closing
While this is not all inclusive of my positions, current or future
The memo says it is not a complete list of the General Counsel's positions and may be updated and reissued.
Who is affected
-
From the sourceHeading
TO: Regional Directors, Officers-in-Charge,
The memo is addressed to the NLRB's regional staff.
-
Our analysisIntroduction
Regions should continue to investigate the cases and, if justified, pursue prosecution according to extant Board law.
Employers and unions with pending cases on the listed issues are most directly affected, because the memo tells regions how these cases will be handled and which arguments the General Counsel will make to the Board.
-
Our analysisAnticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
which held that an employer’s statutory obligation to check off union dues ends when its collective- bargaining agreement containing a checkoff provision expires.
Unionized employers with expiring contracts that contain a dues checkoff provision have a particular interest, since the General Counsel would urge a return to the rule that the checkoff obligation ends when the contract expires.
What it means in practice
-
Our analysisIntroduction
Regions should continue to investigate the cases and, if justified, pursue prosecution according to extant Board law.
The decisions the memo targets remain current Board law until the Board itself overturns them. Work rules, severance agreements, captive audience meetings and dress codes are still judged under those decisions for now.
-
Our analysisIntroduction
I am issuing this memorandum to identify cases where I have requested or intend to request the Board to revisit certain precedents.
If the Board adopts these positions, employers could see looser standards on severance terms, work rules, captive audience meetings, dress codes, bargaining before changes and remedies. The timing depends on Board decisions the memo does not predict.
-
Our analysisIntroduction
Regions have been, and continue to be, provided with guidance on best practices to use in the settlement, and prosecution, of the cases and issues discussed in the memo.
Settlement discussions in pending cases may reflect these positions, since regions receive guidance on settlement for these issues.
What to do
Required
This memo is guidance from the NLRB's General Counsel and creates no new legal requirement for employers. It states positions the General Counsel will argue to the Board and tells regional offices to keep applying current Board law.
Worth considering
-
Our suggestionIntroduction
Regions should continue to investigate the cases and, if justified, pursue prosecution according to extant Board law.
Consider continuing to apply current Board standards to handbooks, work rules, severance agreements and dress codes, since regions are told to follow current Board law until the Board changes it.
-
Our suggestionAnticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
This memorandum may be updated and reissued when arguments are finalized.
Consider tracking Board decisions in the cases the memo names, and watching for an updated version of this memo.
-
Our suggestionIntroduction
Regions have been, and continue to be, provided with guidance on best practices to use in the settlement, and prosecution, of the cases and issues discussed in the memo.
If you have a pending charge involving one of these issues, consider reviewing with counsel how the General Counsel's positions might affect settlement options.
-
Our suggestionAnticipated Positions to Present to the Board for Consideration
I disagree with Valley Hospital Medical Center, Inc., 371 NLRB No. 160, (2022)
If you check off union dues under a contract that is expiring, consider keeping current practice in line with present Board law while noting that the General Counsel intends to challenge the Valley Hospital decision.
Open questions
The source leaves these open. We'll update this record if a later document answers them.
-
When will the Board rule on the General Counsel's requests to overturn these decisions?
-
What other Board decisions might the General Counsel challenge?
-
What settlement and prosecution guidance have regional offices received on these issues?
History
-
GC 26-04: Further Guidance Regarding General Counsel Priorities Source (opens in a new tab)